Mobile Phone Prices

 I'm actually a bit surprised that an EPO examiner let through a claim with "on or near" as a positional feature. I don't see any explanation in the description of how close to the touchscreen "near" is supposed to mean, which results in a pretty obvious Art. 84 objection. Apart from that, since the touchscreen is quite clearly defined as a touch-sensitive screen, there could also be question of insufficient disclosure under Art. 83 (even if there is much talk of a "proximity sensor" throughout the description.

I'm also quite surprised to see that Google, Samsung et al allowed the opposition periods for all these touch interface patents of Apple to lapse. Were they asleep? It isn´t as if Apple had made a secret of these patents or of what they intended to do with them... mobile prices in Pakistan